Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000051.xml
Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33(04): 247-257
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696988
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696988
Review Article
Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
17 October 2019 (online)
Abstract
Nipple sparing mastectomy has been popularized in the modern era of breast cancer treatment due to its touted advantages with regard to resultant body image and reconstructive outcome. Implant-based techniques remain the most prevalent means of breast reconstruction. Special considerations regarding patient selection and technique are reviewed for implant reconstruction in the setting of mastectomy with nipple preservation. Applications for prepectoral and direct-to-implant reconstruction are discussed and published outcomes are summarized.
Disclosures
None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.
-
References
- 1 Carlson GW, Bostwick III J, Styblo TM. , et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 1997; 225 (05) 570-575 , discussion 575–578
- 2 Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Luini A, Veronesi P. Breast cancer: from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment. Front Oncol 2012; 2: 125
- 3 Krajewski AC, Boughey JC, Degnim AC. , et al. Expanded Indications and Improved Outcomes for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Over Time. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3317-3323
- 4 Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S. , et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 118 (03) 623-633
- 5 Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little III JW. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80 (05) 699-704
- 6 Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ. , et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 15-23
- 7 Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ. , et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (03) 320e-326e
- 8 Casella D, Calabrese C, Orzalesi L. , et al. Current trends and outcomes of breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: results from a national multicentric registry with 1006 cases over a 6-year period. Breast Cancer 2017; 24 (03) 451-457
- 9 Hieken TJ, Boolbol SK, Dietz JR. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and techniques. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (10) 3138-3144
- 10 Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM. , et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 496-506
- 11 Rusby JE, Gui GP. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with large or ptotic breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (10) e754-e755
- 12 Schneider LF, Chen CM, Stolier AJ, Shapiro RL, Ahn CY, Allen RJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate free-flap reconstruction in the large ptotic breast. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (04) 425-428
- 13 Jensen JA, Lin JH, Kapoor N, Giuliano AE. Surgical delay of the nipple-areolar complex: a powerful technique to maximize nipple viability following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (10) 3171-3176
- 14 Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Seiboth LA, Hannan CM. Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (03) 572-581
- 15 Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 432-443
- 16 Alperovich M, Choi M, Frey JD. , et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with prior breast irradiation: are patients at higher risk for reconstructive complications?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (02) 202e-206e
- 17 Frederick MJ, Lin AM, Neuman R, Smith BL, Austen Jr WG, Colwell AS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with previous breast surgery: comparative analysis of 775 immediate breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 954e-962e
- 18 Reish RG, Lin A, Phillips NA. , et al. Breast reconstruction outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 959-966
- 19 Colwell AS, Christensen JM. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction): 44S-50S
- 20 Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U. , et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (03) 361-365
- 21 Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED. , et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (05) 1005-1014
- 22 NCCN Guidelines® & Clinical Resources. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx . Accessed July 11, 2019
- 23 Chu CK, Carlson GW. Techniques and outcomes of nipple sparing mastectomy in the surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2013; 5 (02) 118-124
- 24 Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 2008; 95 (11) 1356-1361
- 25 Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, Swistel A, Talmor M. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (01) 1e-8e
- 26 Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Carabalona S. , et al. MRI and intraoperative pathology to predict nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in patients undergoing NAC-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51 (14) 1882-1889
- 27 Kneubil MC, Lohsiriwat V, Curigliano G. , et al. Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (13) 4117-4123
- 28 Luo D, Ha J, Latham B. , et al. The accuracy of intraoperative subareolar frozen section in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ochsner J 2010; 10 (03) 188-192
- 29 Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS. , et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (30) 4948-4954
- 30 Colwell AS, Gadd M, Smith BL, Austen Jr WG. An inferolateral approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 65 (02) 140-143
- 31 Rodriguez-Feliz J, Codner MA. Embrace the change: incorporating single-stage implant breast reconstruction into your practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (02) 221-231
- 32 Carlson GW, Chu CK, Moyer HR, Duggal C, Losken A. Predictors of nipple ischemia after nipple sparing mastectomy. Breast J 2014; 20 (01) 69-73
- 33 Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C. , et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg 2009; 249 (01) 26-32
- 34 Clemens MW, Kronowitz S, Selber JC. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (01) 20-25
- 35 Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (06) 1305-1312
- 36 Frey JD, Choi M, Salibian AA, Karp NS. Comparison of outcomes with tissue expander, immediate implant, and autologous breast reconstruction in greater than 1000 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (06) 1300-1310
- 37 Khavanin N, Jordan S, Lovecchio F, Fine NA, Kim J. Synergistic interactions with a high intraoperative expander fill volume increase the risk for mastectomy flap necrosis. J Breast Cancer 2013; 16 (04) 426-431
- 38 Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW. , et al. Tissue expander reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the effects of coverage technique on nipple/areola preservation. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77 (01) 17-24
- 39 Selber JC, Wren JH, Garvey PB. , et al. Critical evaluation of risk factors and early complications in 564 consecutive two-stage implant-based breast reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix at a single center. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (01) 10-20
- 40 Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen Jr WG. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 1170-1178
- 41 Wapnir I, Dua M, Kieryn A. , et al. Intraoperative imaging of nipple perfusion patterns and ischemic complications in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (01) 100-106
- 42 Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM. , et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 287-294
- 43 Snyderman RK, Guthrie RH. Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 47 (06) 565-567
- 44 Chattha A, Bucknor A, Chen AD, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Indocyanine Green Angiography use in breast reconstruction: a national analysis of outcomes and cost in 110,320 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 825-832
- 45 Pontell ME, Saad N, Brown A, Rose M, Ashinoff R, Saad A. Single stage nipple-sparing mastectomy and reduction mastopexy in the ptotic breast. Plast Surg Int 2018; 2018: 9205805
- 46 Economides JM, Graziano F, Tousimis E, Willey S, Pittman TA. Expanded algorithm and updated experience with breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty in the large or ptotic breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (04) 688e-697e
- 47 Schwartz JC. A new approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction in the high risk ptotic patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (05) e1779
- 48 Sosin M, Gulla A, Potdevin L. , et al. Timing of radiation therapy in nipple-sparing mastectomy influences outcomes and patient-reported quality of life. Breast J 2018; 24 (06) 934-939
- 49 Spear SL, Shuck J, Hannan L, Albino F, Patel KM. Evaluating long-term outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction in the irradiated breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (05) 605e-614e
- 50 Jadeja P, Ha R, Rohde C. , et al. Expanding the criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with poor prognostic features. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18 (03) 229-233
- 51 Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M. , et al. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20 (10) 3294-3302
- 52 Bartholomew AJ, Dervishaj OA, Sosin M. , et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nipple-sparing mastectomy: timing and postoperative complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2019
- 53 Santoro S, Loreti A, Cavaliere F. , et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not a contraindication for nipple sparing mastectomy. Breast 2015; 24 (05) 661-666
- 54 Choi M, Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS. Nipple-areola complex malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a review of risk factors and corrective techniques from greater than 1000 reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 247e-257e
- 55 Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, Dent BL, Taylor EM, Talmor M. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (05) 1053-1062
- 56 Rossi C, Mingozzi M, Curcio A, Buggi F, Folli S. Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (06) 528-540
- 57 Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, Gasgarth R, Carlson GW. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (05) 446-450
- 58 Dossett LA, Lowe J, Sun W. , et al. Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114 (01) 11-16
- 59 Anderson RC, Cunningham B, Tafesse E, Lenderking WR. Validation of the breast evaluation questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (03) 597-602
- 60 Baxter NN, Goodwin PJ, McLeod RS, Dion R, Devins G, Bombardier C. Reliability and validity of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire. Breast J 2006; 12 (03) 221-232
- 61 El Hage Chehade H, Headon H, Wazir U. , et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy using a hemi-periareolar incision with or without minimal medial-lateral extensions; clinical outcome and patient satisfaction: A single centre prospective observational study. Am J Surg 2017; 213 (06) 1116-1124
- 62 De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3241-3249
- 63 Agha RA, Al Omran Y, Wellstead G. , et al. Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open 2018; 3 (02) 135-145
- 64 Balci FL, Kara H, Dulgeroglu O, Uras C. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with short tumor-nipple distance. Breast J 2019; 25 (04) 612-618